The term “weak men senators” is subjective and often appears in 

political commentary and opinion pieces rather than as an objective descriptor. The phrase is generally used to criticize specific senators for their policy positions, lack of perceived resolve, or voting records by political opponents, pundits, or the public. 

Examples of contexts where the term or similar criticisms have appeared recently include:

• Legislative Disputes: In December 2024, Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) publicly referred to then-House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) as a “weak, weak man” over a proposed spending bill.
• Political Commentary: Political figures and commentators sometimes use the phrase to attack opponents. For example, in 2025, an opinion piece in NC Newsline referred to Senator Thom Tillis (R-N.C.)’s decision on a nomination as “cowardice”. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) has also reportedly referred to “weak Republican men”.
• Vulnerability Assessments: The media often refers to “vulnerable” senators in the context of upcoming elections, which can be interpreted by some as a sign of weakness, though this is an objective assessment of their electoral position, not character.
• Historical Context: Historically, the term “weak men” has been used in general discussions about the character of senators. President Woodrow Wilson, in his early 20th-century writings, defended senators against characterizations that they were weak or dishonorable. 

The application of “weak” is a matter of opinion, and different sources will apply it to different individuals based on their own political perspectives. You can find a current, objective list of all serving United States senators on the official U.S. Senate website.